Wednesday 5/27/09

|

WOD - "Dutch vs. Speal"

For Time:
10 Thrusters (
135# m, 85# w)
50 Double-unders
8 Thrusters
40 Double-unders
6 Thrusters
30 Double-unders
4 Thrusters
20 Double-unders
2 Thrusters
10 Double-unders

Compare to 3/9/09
(Post time to comments)

Dutch vs. Speal ...[wmv][mov]
Video courtesy of CrossFit.Com

5 comments:

Mandi said...

Hmmm. Murph followed by Barbara.....Ouch! I am still feeling Murph. Great work Jason.

Cameron said...

This should be interesting...

If we can not to double unders yet, do we substitute the same # of singles?

Mandi said...

Hey Cameron, A good substitute for double-unders are tuck-jumps. They generate an equal amount of force. If you are doing single-unders you have to do a minimum of double the prescribed jumps.

Here is what CrossFit.com has to say about it.
http://www.crossfit.com/cf-info/faq.html#Substitutions11

Evan said...

Good job today gang.

Scaled:

85% Rx'd Load

Cameron S. - 14:44 (115#)
Sean - 7::44 (115#, 2X Singels)

76% Rx'd Load

Susan - 10:41 (70/65#, Single/Double 25/25, 20/20, etc. - last round 10 Double Unders)
Lindsay - 10:26 (65#, 2x Singles - last round 10 Double Unders)
Laura - 11:45 (65#, 2x Singles)

70% Rx'd Load

Cameron G. - 7:22 (95#, 2x Singels)
Steve - 7:23 (95#, 2x Singels)
Matt - 7:38 (95#, 2x Singels Rd 1, then 1x Singles)

62% Rx'd Load

Pat - 9:25 (85#, 20# DB Swing sub 1:1)

Jamison Peter Hibbard said...

115#

11:14